No, there's nothing wrong with the other XML solutions, except the fact that we
needed our solution in 2001, already, and that it runs on all the other
It turned out to be 3 times faster than XerCes, BTW, when there were some
efforts at our site to get rid of it, in favor of XerCes, so this was not done
(and XerCes is in C++, and we didn't want C++ at out site - or more precisely:
we are a "C, PL/1 and ASSEMBLER only" shop).
Am 25.07.2013 11:51, schrieb M.P.:
> Anything wrong with System XML? Perfectly feasible to use from HLASM.
> Cheers, M.